Discute:Psicolojia temprana

Esta paje es no projeto per Vicipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research Anonymous Grammar Mistake (discute) 01:36, 3 setembre 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La Vicipedia en catalan e euscara ave un punto de vide noneutral e me no vide ce los ave cambias. En loca de critica la labora de otras, lo ta es plu bon ce tu aida creante contenidas. Plu, sur cual tu fundi tua afirma ce esta article ave un punto de vide noneutral? --Jeneme (discute) 09:40, 3 setembre 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I am not well learned enough yet to write any complex thought in elefen. You will have to forgive me on that. If possible, I wish to go back in time once I have learned enough to rewrite my message. Anyways, on with the points.

"En loca de critica la labora de otras, lo ta es plu bon ce tu aida creante contenidas."

Me scrive no bon. Me aprendeda. Me ta scrive bon: Me va creada. Anyways, even in english and french wikipedias, what I do is what I like to describe as "fairy work": I verify and correct article's sources (or archive them, if possible and not done already); I remove vandalism and bogus sentences; I point out likely wikipedia policy violation(s); I reread with an autocorrector, grammar book, and a dictionary to make sure sentences make sense; I correct typoes; etc. While my work may seem small in comparison, it does improve Wikipedia a bit. I chose to do this because I am a busy student with a terribly unforgiving schedule. Fairies are small and hard to notice, but they bring magic to every place they visit. Besides, I'm pretty sure my initial comment does not count as criticism.

"Plu, sur cual tu fundi tua afirma ce esta article ave un punto de vide noneutral?"

Basically, it's a technicality. I know it might sound redundant since the reasoning is similar to W:NOR. Quoted from W:NPOV:

"All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means (...) all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic."

no source / no reliable source = noneutral

By the way, one more thing: I am not well versed enough on the copyright policies of wikipedia, but I'm almost sure that this article's licensing violates in part W:Copyrights:

"If you contribute text directly to Wikipedia, you thereby license it to the public for reuse under CC BY-SA and GFDL (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)."

The reasoning is that the author cannot reserve all rights on this text as it is on Wikipedia, but only if it would be republished on another site or medium. Also, it's pretty unwikipedia-like to end an article with a copyright messag Notice - My mother tongue is french and I'm currently actively learning elefen. I can mostly understand messages in elefen, and you would not help me learn if you reply the way I did and for that I apologize again. 173.178.97.195 04:07, 4 setembre 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this is me above, you would not believe how often I forget to log in. Anonymous Grammar Mistake (discute) 04:09, 4 setembre 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de probleme. Tu as explique ton point de vue et je parlerai avec l'auteur pour trouver une solution. Il y a une grammaire de lingua franca nova traduite en francais, laquelle tu pourras trouver ici. Le dictionnaire a aussi des mots avec sa traduction en francais, tu peux le trouver ici, si tu veux, tu peux aussi collaborer la-bas. --Jeneme (discute) 07:45, 4 setembre 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my use of copyright on the "history of psychology" pages. They will be moved to the elefen wici very soon. Thank you for your patience! Cgboeree (discute) 14:21, 4 setembre 2019 (UTC)[reply]